Jake, how did you become moderator?; I’ve been tracking your thought process and I see youve got a statistical mostly scientific approach to this whole Demonology thing not that there’s an error here.
I disagree with the label "statistical" - perhaps you mean "empirical"? I am of the opinion that skeptical scientific investigation of paranormal claims is the only way that they should be investigated. As CSI states, skeptics "encourage the critical investigation of paranormal and fringe-science claims from a responsible, scientific point of view and disseminate factual information about the results of such inquiries to the scientific community and the public." How else should it be?
However I recall Monstrous’s Forum slogan being “A safe haven for all monsters…” Not “A safe haven for all scientifically proven, statistically confirmed real monsters…”
I understand that the "safe haven" relates to the
members here, not to Jabberwockys etc. As a good deal of people here claim to be demon hunters, this could hardly be called a safe haven for demons, could it?
Oh and Jake, I have proof of demons, if you are willing to risk an encounter with them that is…
I look forward to seeing the proof.
