Monstrous

CryptoZoo => Sightings! => Topic started by: Nina on July 31, 2008, 09:50:43 AM

Title: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Nina on July 31, 2008, 09:50:43 AM
Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!

(http://images.nymag.com/images/2/daily/intel/08/07/30_deadcritter_lg.jpg)

Yesterday, Gawker ran what appeared to be a photo of a bloated, leathery animal corpse only it was like no animal anyone had seen before. A stout, hairless creature with a beak, claws, and the almond-shaped eyes familiar from renderings of space aliens, it looked, in short, like a monster. Hence the headline: "Dead Monster Washes Ashore in Montauk." The photo had come over e-mail to Anna Holmes, the managing editor at Jezebel, from an employee at Evolutionary Media Group, in Los Angeles; Holmes passed it on to Gawker. Because it came from a marketing company, Gawker surmised, "our guess is that it's viral marketing for something." They later pointed to  a Cartoon Network show, Cryptids Are Real, which features similar-looking chubby monsters. We called Evolutionary, where a woman named Alanna Navitski, who claimed to be responsible for the tip, swore it was not a viral-marketing campaign. "This is what happened," she said.

"I got this e-mail and opened it from my girlfriend who works at Harris Publications, which has nothing to do with anything. Anyway, my girlfriend's sister was there with her friends and one of them took the picture. And we were like, 'This is the scariest s**t we've ever seen.' And so I'm in marketing were like, 'Maybe we should send it to a few blogs and see if anyone else is as freaked out as we are.' We had no idea that it would turn into this. Now it's literally a beast of its own. But it has nothing to do with any kind of campaign."

In fact, this turned out to be true. A number of eyewitnesses say they saw the monster with their own eyes. "I saw the monster," says Michael Meehan, a 22-year-old waiter at the Surfside Inn, which sits above the beach where the monster washed up. "I just came walking down the beach and everyone was looking at it. No one knew what it was. It kind of looked like a dog, but it had this crazy-looking beak. I mean, I would freak out if something like that popped up next to me in the water."

So did anyone there, you know, do anything about it?

"This woman kept calling animal control," said Meehan. "She wanted to name it after herself. I think they came and got it. The carcass. Whatever it was."

But did they? The East Hampton branch of animal control referred Daily Intel to a supervisor who did not return calls for comment. And Navitski, of Evolutionary Media Group, says her friend's sister (who doesn't want to talk to the press, though Plum TV will host another woman, Jenna Hewitt, who claims she took a photo, tomorrow) says animal control never came. "They say an old guy came and carted it away," she said. "He said, 'I'm going to mount it on my wall.'

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/07/the_monster_of_montauk.html
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 05, 2008, 09:33:01 PM
 Honestly... it looks like a cat. Same shape of skull. And the 'beak' could just be that the animal had a deformity. Or it's face was bashed against rocks and coral, shaving the bone down to what appears to be a beak.  :-D
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: TheTerror on August 14, 2008, 10:49:32 AM
wow is it wearing a braclet
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: TheTerror on August 14, 2008, 10:50:05 AM
yes it is wearing a bracelet
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 14, 2008, 10:52:10 AM
 No... it's more likely a piece of seaweed. Or... to stretch it a bit... a leash or some other sort of restraint.
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: TheTerror on August 14, 2008, 10:59:03 AM
oh........dang.......told you it was that
'goes off wisteling so nobody knows he was wrong'
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 14, 2008, 11:03:50 AM
 No worries... I've been wrong plenty of times on here!
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: TheTerror on August 14, 2008, 01:41:34 PM
wat ev
ya I am too sometime
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Petling on August 21, 2008, 07:24:33 PM
It looks like a broken restraint or something. Could be an ordinary animal someone tortured, then dumped. That would explain some stuff, any news of an autopsy yet? :?
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 21, 2008, 07:25:39 PM
 Like I said before... I think it's a cat.
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Petling on August 21, 2008, 07:29:57 PM
The body shape is all wrong though, unless it got bloated in the sun before it was discovered? :?
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 21, 2008, 08:11:09 PM
 Being in the water bloats you as well. It said it was found on a beach... I'd assume it washed up...
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Petling on August 21, 2008, 08:17:29 PM
Yeah, could the water have been why the fur came off? Or maybe it was removed by the pervert if it was, indeed, tortured?
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 21, 2008, 08:20:07 PM
 No... in order to remove the fur without hurting the skin, you'd have to leave it in the sun for a long time.. (tanning a hide) And if it was left in the sun and worked, the corpse would be even more damaged and rotted than it is now. It's just the way it is due to exposure. And the 'restraints' we're seeing could just be seaweed. (as I mentioned earlier.)
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Petling on August 21, 2008, 08:24:27 PM
True, true. Not disputing anybodies claims, just throwing in my opinion. :-D
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 21, 2008, 08:34:38 PM
 I know you're not, dear. It's nice to have someone intelligent posting on this... makes for a good discussion.
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on August 30, 2009, 10:24:26 AM

 The History Channel actually did a little bit on this. Here's what they had to say. What do you think??


http://www.history.com/video.do?name=monsterquest&bcpid=1541043106&bclid=9525765001&bctid=1883578405 (http://www.history.com/video.do?name=monsterquest&bcpid=1541043106&bclid=9525765001&bctid=1883578405)
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: HiMyNameIsHarv on March 13, 2010, 06:47:14 PM
Has it been thought that this animal actually came from the water? As in, is a water-living animal?

By looking at it, it has no features of a fish, but it looks like it may be able to swim quite well by the looks of it's limbs and 'paws'.  Actually, looking at it, it looks like an oversized racoon? 

*Just did research*

Yeah, it looks like it COULD be a large racoon. Evidence found below:
http://ifishct.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/random-photos/montauk-monster-racoon.jpg (http://ifishct.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/random-photos/montauk-monster-racoon.jpg)

If I want to go way beyond imagination, it could be an animal that has been tested on in cruelty (the possible leash) to see how long it could last in the water without it's fur  (it's skinned)

But yeah, continue discussion!  I'm interested :)

Peace!
Title: Re: Investigating the Montauk Monster: The Story Deepens!
Post by: Kadesh on May 22, 2010, 09:19:54 AM
 The "experts" do, indeed believe it to be a raccoon. Without knowing the size and/or dimensions of the beast, it's hard to tell. If only I could have had a crack at the actual remains..... :roll: