Just a moment, I need to ask my computer what my opinion is. The problem is that we're becoming far too reliant on machines to do things such as simple math. While shopping, the cashier told my dad that the computer wasn't working and so he couldn't figure out the tax so he would just charge 50 cents. The actual tax amount was like 17. It's a petty example but I think it demonstrates the point nicely.
I would like to put my two cents worth in on technolgy from a medical stand point. Yes we have the technology. Yes we can prolong life with machines. Yes we are bound by our oath to preserve life. My question is at what cost? Over population and decline of quality of life. My co-workes have ridiculed me for my stance, but we are distorting the natural order of life and death. History have proven time and time again that it will have negative consequences. We are not a species that uses much forethought or introspection. In using technology to prolong life, we are actually causing chaos in the order of life. I am not saying ban all technology, just offer other life choices for the human condition know as death.Empty Void
Of course we have the right to use technology and of course it has provided many results that are nothing short of miracles. However, there's a difference between using technology and absolutely depending on it for every little thing.Take for example a few trinkets you may find in a "Seen on TV" stores or sometimes a Brookstone. Like the robotic floor cleaner. Push a button or two and it's off to work on your floors. Or perhas the ab belt (which is rather shady). Put it on and push a button and it's (supposedly) exercising for you. It's items like these that are leading to a dangerously decadent future where people may forget the work and in so forget the value of the result.I'm not preaching complete abstinence from technology, I'm just saying that there are some situations where you really shouldn't be using a machine.