Turning dead cells into live tissue.

Started by Sick_Angel13, July 26, 2008, 05:08:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Scientists turn dead cells into live tissue

Breakthrough could mean new treatments for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's but, instead of defusing opposition, it is likely to raise new ethical dilemmas

Scientists working at a British laboratory have achieved one of the most controversial breakthroughs ever made in the field of stem cell science by taking cells from dead embryos and turning them into living tissue. The technique could soon be used to create treatments for patients suffering from diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, the researchers say. The breakthrough has been hailed by many scientists and ethical experts because it could circumvent opposition to stem cell experiments.

'This should get round opposition to stem cell science because live embryos will no longer need to be used in all experiments,' said Professor Miodrag Stojkovic, the researcher who carried out the experiments at the Centre for Stem Cell Biology at Newcastle University last year.

But other experts last night warned that the use of dead embryo cells could lead to more ethical dilemmas, not fewer. 'How do you know when an embryo is dead?' said Eric Meslin, director of the Indiana University center of bioethics.

Stem cells extracted from embryos are prized by scientists because they are capable of turning into any cell or tissue type in the body. Ultimately they could be used as treatments for heart disease and diabetes and other diseases, researchers argue. But the technology involves creating and destroying living embryos to extract stem cells. Usually these embryos are made at fertility clinics when couples go for in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

However, Stojkovic's work suggests it may be possible to avoid using live embryos; instead, scientists use those that have died naturally during IVF. It would also mean that many more embryos were available for research and eventual treatment of the diseases, speeding up advancements in the cutting-edge science.

Stojkovic's experiments were carried out while he was working at the Centre for Stem Cell Biology at Newcastle last year. In a paper, published last week online on the website of the journal Stem Cells, Stojkovic reveals he and his colleagues took 13 embryos, created by IVF. All 13 had stopped developing a few days after conception. 'They were in a very early stage of development,' said Stojkovic, now head of Sintocell, the Serbian medical research centre.

The team then waited 24 hours to check that the embryos were no longer dividing before beginning their experiments. 'These were all deemed to be arrested embryos,' said Stojkovic. 'In other words, they were dead. [But] they had the capacity to develop any different type of cell you could think of, including kidney cells, liver cells, and skin cells.'

'I think this is a very important development, although stem cells created this way should not be seen as an alternative to those made from live embryos. They should be seen as an additional source.'

Last night right-to-life campaigners called for caution. 'In theory if an embryo is obtained ethically and a stem cell can be derived after that embryo has died naturally, then that will remove all ethical objections as there is no destruction of a living organism,' said Josephine Quintavalle, of Comment on Reproductive Ethics, a Catholic campaign group. 'We do not have objections to the use of donated tissue and organs in other areas of medicine.'

But Quintavalle warned that the case for the use of dead embryo cells had not been proved. 'There is the critical question of how you know when an embryo is dead or not.'

George Daley, of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, said the paper's approach raised scientific concerns. 'If there was something wrong with the embryo that made it arrest, isn't there something wrong with these cells? We don't know.'

However, Stojkovic's work was given strong backing by Donald Landry, at the Columbia University Medical Center in New York, who called the work an important addition to the field. 'Regardless of how you feel about personhood for embryos, if the embryo is dead, then the issue of personhood is resolved,' Landry said.

'This then reduces the ethics of human embryonic stem cell generation to the ethics of, say, organ donation. So now you're really saying, "Can we take live cells from dead embryos the way we take live organs from dead patients?"'

What they do


· Embryonic stem cells have the ability to develop into any type of cell in the human body, from brain cells to skin and kidney cells.

· By creating cloned embryos of patients, it might one day be possible to grow their stem cells in the laboratory, say scientists. These could use then be used as transplants.

· Diseases such as diabetes, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's - in which particular organs or pieces of tissue have been destroyed - are thought to be the best candidates for treatments.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2006/sep/24/highereducation.research



Hmm......... proverbial walking frankens......... except much prettier :lol:.
The closer you get to light, the greater your shadow becomes.
But don't be afraid. And don't forget...
You hold the mightiest weapon of all.
-Kingdom Hearts

Sounds a lot like Resident Evil.
I'm ready.  :gun:
It is better to conquer yourself than to win many battles. Then the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

The situation is a demonic paradox: we have toppled the system but we still carry its genes.

you are too violent. this alone has no capacity for zombification.

Quote from: DemonHunterofIndiana on July 29, 2008, 10:58:26 AM
Sounds a lot like Resident Evil.
I'm ready.  :gun:
The closer you get to light, the greater your shadow becomes.
But don't be afraid. And don't forget...
You hold the mightiest weapon of all.
-Kingdom Hearts

But it's a beginning if anyone had the intention to make zombification possible.

Quote from: Raziel on July 30, 2008, 09:37:50 AM
you are too violent. this alone has no capacity for zombification.

Quote from: DemonHunterofIndiana on July 29, 2008, 10:58:26 AM
Sounds a lot like Resident Evil.
I'm ready.  :gun:
Violence? No way. I am a way of martial self-defense. That's all. I've just pugnacious in nature.   :focus:
It is better to conquer yourself than to win many battles. Then the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

The situation is a demonic paradox: we have toppled the system but we still carry its genes.

No, this would make orks.
The closer you get to light, the greater your shadow becomes.
But don't be afraid. And don't forget...
You hold the mightiest weapon of all.
-Kingdom Hearts

Quote from: Raziel on July 31, 2008, 12:41:23 AM
No, this would make orks.
What the fork is an ork?  :?
It is better to conquer yourself than to win many battles. Then the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

The situation is a demonic paradox: we have toppled the system but we still carry its genes.

An "Orc", is a mythological/fantasy creature, usually assigned an evil status.

Want to know about Orcs... think Lord of the Rings.


Nope i meant ORK, warhammer 40k. Ork.
The closer you get to light, the greater your shadow becomes.
But don't be afraid. And don't forget...
You hold the mightiest weapon of all.
-Kingdom Hearts

I don't believe that using stem cells would make zombies.These mesenchymal cells have the ability to become blasts and clasts which can build up and break down in whatever system you put them in.I think its a great idea as long as they are used in isolation for that one system.
We are all unique.You my dear are uniquely non-unique.